That is the Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300 showdown that I promised within the evaluate of the previous.
Asus’ newest Wi-Fi 6E router is the reply to the Netgear counterpart, whether or not anybody needs to confess it or not. Sharing the very same Wi-Fi specs and processing energy, the 2 look like reduce from the identical material. Or are?
There are various similarities between the 2, however but they could not be extra totally different. Let’s go in!
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: One offers the opposite a very good run for its cash
The RT-AXE7800 and RAXE300 are two eye-catching Wi-Fi routers. One seems to be like a spaceship and the opposite, nicely, a useless spider, however in a cool manner.
Whereas I really like the RAXE300 for its nice seems to be, the RT-AXE7800 is rather more sensible. It is extra compact, lighter, and able to mount on the wall proper out of the field.
In some ways, the 2 symbolize Asus and Netgear, respectively, in Wi-Fi designs and approaches. And in that sense, the RT-AXE7800 shares each the great and the dangerous of the RAXE300. After which, you will have a bit of extra. Truly, rather more.
With that, we’re going to pit them towards one another on {hardware} specs.
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: {Hardware} Specs
 |
 |
|
| Asus AXE7800 Tri-Band Wi-Fi 6E Router | netgear nighthawk 8-stream AXE7800 Tri-Band Wi-Fi 6E Router |
|
| Mannequin | Asus RT-AXE7800 | Netgear RAXE300 |
| wifi know-how | AXE7800 Tri-band | AXE7800 Tri-band |
| first band | 2.4GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 As much as 574Mbps (20/40MHz) |
2.4GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 As much as 574Mbps (20/40MHz) |
| second band | 5GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 As much as 4804Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
5GHz 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 As much as 4804Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
| Third Band | 6GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6E As much as 2402Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
6GHz 2×2 Wi-Fi 6E As much as 2402Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
| Compatibility with earlier variations | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac |
| PA mode | Sure | Sure |
| mesh prepared | Sure (AiMesh) |
Nope |
| Gigabit community port | 1 WAN/LAN 3 LANs |
1x WAN/WAN 4x LAN |
| Multi-gigabit community port | 1 2.5Gbps LAN/WAN | 1 2.5Gbps LAN/WAN |
| LAN Hyperlink Aggregation | Sure | Sure |
| WAN Hyperlink Aggregation | Sure | Nope |
| Twin WAN | Sure | Nope |
| USB | 1 USB 3.0 (USB-A) |
1x USB 3.0 (USB-C) |
| Cell app | Asus router | netgear nighthawk |
| processing energy | 1.7GHz quad-core CPU, 256MB Flash, 512MB RAM |
1.7GHz quad-core CPU, 256MB Flash, 512MB RAM |
| Dimensions | 9.57 x 8.78 x 6.1 inches (24.3 x 22.3 x 15.5cm) |
11.86 x 8.16 x 3.23 inches (30.13 x 20.79 x 8.2cm) |
| Weight | 2.28 kilos (1.33 kg) | 2.23 kilos (1.01 kg) |
| firmware model (in Evaluate) |
3.0.0.4.388_21593 | 1.0.4.52_1 |
| energy enter | 100-240V | 100-120V |
| energy consumption (for twenty-four hours) |
≈ 185Wh | ≈ 200Wh |
| Launch date | September 2022 | January 2022 |
| Value (in publish) |
$329.99 | $399.99 |
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: higher firmware to win
The 2 are nearly similar in {hardware} specs.
Each are tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers on the Wi-Fi entrance, of which solely the 5GHz will get the top-tier remedy. Its 2.4GHz and 6GHz bands are middling with the latter’s bandwidth caps at simply 2400Mbps.
Each routers share the identical processing energy and the identical variety of community ports. There is just one 2.5GbE multi-gigabit port that may perform as a LAN or WAN.
That being stated, what units them aside is the firmware. Netgear makes use of proprietary firmware whose native net interface has been slowly deprecated over time to drive customers to make use of the Nighthawk cellular app. You want this app, which requires an account login, and paying a handful of subscriptions to get essentially the most out of the router.
The Asus, then again, runs on open supply Linux-based firmware that offers you a strong net UI and an optionally available Asus Router cellular app. Regardless of which one you employ, there is no such thing as a want to enroll in a login account with the supplier. On high of that, it shares many options and settings with different Asus routers, all free for all times.
And final however not least, the Asus RT-AX7800 is mesh prepared. You need to use it as the primary router or satellite tv for pc node of an AiMesh system. (Because it would not have a further 5GHz band, it is best used with wired backhauling.)
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: score and efficiency
benefit
Nice efficiency with tons of community settings with nice characteristic set, free on-line safety and parental controls
AiMesh 2.0 help with multi-gigabit wired backhauling as satellite tv for pc
Tremendous versatile community ports for twin WAN and LAN/WAN hyperlink aggregations
Compact and sensible design; comparatively reasonably priced
benefit
Wi-Fi 6E prepared with wonderful efficiency
Versatile 2.5 Gbps LAN/WAN port, USB-C
Sturdy net interface, helpful cellular app (optionally available)
Cool fanless design that may be mounted on the wall
cons
Medium 6 GHz spec, no normal distant administration by way of Dynamic DNS
No 10 Gbps port, just one 2.5 Gbps port; Wi-Fi on/off button not nicely thought out
Restricted Wi-Fi settings and on-line safety/parental controls require cellular app and subscription
Mediocre NAS efficiency when internet hosting a conveyable SSD; 100-120V energy adapter
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: which one to purchase
At a pleasant worth, the Asus RT-AXE7800 is a lot better than the Netgear RAXE300.
In truth, the one factor Netgear has going for it on this matchup is the distinctive spaceship-like design. Apart from that, it is overpriced and compares to the Asus counterpart.
Nevertheless, Netgear hit the market a lot earlier, and if you have already got it, there isn’t any have to commerce it for Asus. Ultimately, by way of the Wi-Fi expertise, the 2 are very related.
–
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs Netgear RAXE300: One Is a Solid Winner
